
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 18, 2007
Consumer Protection Agency Covered Up Risks from Lead in Children’s Lunchboxes
FOIA reveals CPSC testing showed lead lunchbox risk, yet the agency manipulated tests and misled parents on lunchbox safety
Press Release (below)
FOIA CPSC internal communication
FOIA CPSC testing data/protocol change
FOIA CPSC internal communication
CEH Fact Sheet on Lead in Lunchboxes
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To see the Associated Press story, click here |
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| Consumer Product Safety Commission: Out to Lunch on Lead Risks to Kids | |||||
| Below are details on testing data from documents obtained from the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). The Commission tested vinyl lunchboxes in the fall of 2005, and announced that they found no lead risk to children. But their own test data suggests otherwise: in fact, even before their September 27, 2005 announcement stating that their testing found no lead risk, CPSC had tests showing high lead-containing lunchboxes. Further, CPSC's early testing showed high lead levels in "swipe tests" (simulating lead coming off on a child's hands and/or onto food in lunchboxes), but agency documents obtained by CEH reveal that CPSC then changed their test method, resulting in findings of less lead risk. The documents also suggest that, even though early tests found higher lead levels in some lunchbox interiors (where food is kept and could be contaminated with lead), CPSC did not consistently test lunchbox interiors in later rounds of testing. | |||||
| Furthermore, even the high lead-levels in the "swipe tests" noted below are misleadingly low, as these numbers are average levels of lead found from lunchboxes over several wipes, while children would not be dosed by an average wipe but would receive a cumulative dose of lead every time they handle and eat from the lunchbox. | |||||
| CPSC Sample # | Lunchbox Description | Date Tested | Total lead (ppm)*^ | Swipe Test Total Lead (μg)**^ | Swipe Test Average Lead^ |
| 05-830-4008 | (no lunchbox description given) | 9/29/2005 | 4500, 3670 | 16.94 | 0.565 |
| 05-840-7230 | (no lunchbox description given | 9/20/2005 (10/11/2005) | 1240 | 0.816 | 0.204 |
| 05-840-7336 | Spiderman lunchbox | 9/20/2005 (10/11/2005) | 2500, 4870, 7120 | 1.945 | 0.486 |
| 05-840-7337 | Spiderman lunchbox | 9/20/2005, 9/27/2005 | 4390, 9600 | 1.645, 1.167 | 0.411, 0.292 (changed to 0.0270 with revised protocol) |
| 06-420-7949 | Strawberry Shortcake lunchbox | 11/14/2005 | 700 | 0.237 | 0.0063 |
| 06-420-7954 | Harley Davidson lunchbox | 11/17/2005 | 760 | 0.843 | 0.0281 |
| 06-420-7952 | blue, pink and black LB Style # 43390" made in China | 11/17/2005 | 2050 | 1.463 | 0.0488 |
| 06-810-3984 | Orange lunchbox w/ built in freeze squares | 11/15/2005 | 2110 | 1.31 | 0.0436 |
| 06-810-2555 | NY Yankees Lunchbox | 11/21/2005 | 7690 | 0.0439 | 0.0146 |
| *in paint, lead levels over 600 ppm are illegal. All of these lunchboxes exceed that limit; CPSC documents refer to at least eight other lunchboxes they tested and found levels higher than 600 ppm, however test results for these other eight lunchboxes were missing from the FOIA response. ^multiple numbers refer to tests on different parts of a lunchbox (interior, exterior, &/or other parts) |
**Under California law, products exposing children to over 0.5 ug/day of lead are illegal. The first three lunchboxes exceed that limit; documents show that soon after these early tests, CPSC changed their test method, resulting in the lower levels in later tests. | ||||
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This document reveals that sometime between September 18 (the date of their first reported test result) and September 26, 2005 (the day before they released their statement claiming that vinyl lunchboxes posed no health hazard), CPSC changed their testing protocol. The agency’s initial “wipe testing” (simulating food or a child’s hands being exposed to lead) found high lead levels on at least 4 of the fewer than 10 lunchboxes in the agency’s early tests, suggesting that children would cumulatively receive a very high dose of lead. But the new test method used average lead exposures per wipe over 30 wipes, and as this internal communication shows, the change in the testing method resulted in a lower lead result.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
These two documents show the result of CPSC’s changing their test method. The first document shows that a “Spiderman Lunchbox” was tested on September 19 using the agency’s original method, and was found with high lead levels: the lunchbox had a total lead content of .960% lead by weight, or 9600 ppm, which is 16 times over the legal limit for lead in paint; and, in wipe tests, three surfaces on the lunchbox (two exterior and one interior) all tested cumulatively above 1 microgram of lead (all were over the California safety standard). In the second document, using the revised testing method which increased the number of wipes (from four to 30) and averaged the results, on the same lunchbox CPSC found artificially low levels of lead (.0191, .0270, and .0036, which represent average exposures over 30 wipes).
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The document below reveals that in a test of a section of a lunchbox, the testing showed 16.960 μg of lead from 30 wipes. With these 30 wipes, a child would be exposed to a total amount of lead approximately 34 times the maximum allowable level under California law.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The document below, sent from CPSC to FDA after the latter agency requested CPSC’s test results, reveals that 20% of the 58 lunchboxes sampled by the CPSC were found to contain lead over 600 parts per million, the limit for lead in paint. In CEH testing of hundreds of vinyl lunchboxes, a similar percentage was found with similarly high lead levels. Despite this 1-in-5 testing rate for elevated lead levels, the CPSC still refused to acknowledge any lead hazard to children, but after receiving the CPSC data, the FDA warned manufacturers of vinyl lunchboxes to stop using vinyl in lunchbox interiors, since even trace levels of lead in vinyl lunchboxes would be considered an illegal food additive (seen here: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/pbltr2.html).
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________