| eNewsletter | ![]() |
| December 2007 |
We Thank You |
|
In This Issue |
Support the Work that Children Everywhere are Counting On At the Center for Environmental Health, we've spent the last ten years quietly earning our reputation as the nation's most effective advocate for removing toxic chemicals from the products that children and families use every day. But in 2007, something unusual happened: everyone finally heard about it.
Overnight, the Center for Environmental Health became the national go-to organization on dangerous chemicals in consumer products. Today, when parents, reporters, and other organizations have questions about how to protect families from all the chemically contaminated products on the market, they come to us. And now that families like yours are pushing the government to address the problem, the House and Senate are also turning to us for advice to help them protect people across the country. Won't you please help us protect your family from toxic chemicals in everyday products? Click here to make a secure, online, tax-deductible donation. |
|
Safe Toys for the Holiday Season
Well after this summer's toy recall frenzy, the Center for Environmental Health continued to scour the marketplace for lead contaminated toys. What we found was alarming and discouraging. But it was also something that parents who want to protect their children need to know: there continue to be many lead-contaminated toys on the market. The questions we get every day make it clear that parents around the country want to know how to keep their children safe from all of the lead-tainted toys and other products on the market. They deserve simple and clear answers. Here are a few pointers:
And a few other recommendations:
|
|
|
Shame of the month: CPSC Urges Parents to Hope for the Best Shocking, but true: with all the lead-tainted products on the market, the industry-led Consumer Product Safety Commission is recommending that parents don't bother to test their children's toys for lead. Why? Because, they say, sometimes the tests aren't accurate.
This might be a safe strategy if the CPSC were doing its job and keeping dangerous products out of children's hands, but the Commission has made clear its mandate to protect industry profits at the expense of children's health. With all of the lead tainted toys on the market (we found 20 out of 100 in a sweep of big box stores last month), it is shamefully irresponsible for any government agency to urge parents to let their children go right on using lead tainted toys. We're assembling our predictions for the CPSC's next shameful attempt to twist logic in favor of industries that poison children. Our current favorite: The CPSC urges parents not to use seat belts since they don't always work either. Please send your predictions to charlie@cehca.org. |
|
|
If you're like most people, phthalates (pronounced THAL-ates) are probably something you've never heard of. And if you're like most, they are also something that resides in your body right now. Phthalates are a family of industrial chemicals that is used to soften hard plastics, so you'll find them in shoes, backpacks, personal care products, lunchboxes, bottles, furniture, cars, children's toys, and many other items. Most people in our country are exposed to phthalates on a daily basis. Why should you care? Because once they're in the human body, phthalates, like many industrial chemicals, mimic the behavior of hormones - the chemicals that dictate how we develop, grow, behave, age, and much more. And because even miniscule changes in hormone levels can cause extreme developmental and health problems, phthalates and other hormone mimics have no place near pregnant mothers, infants, babies, and small children. To list just a few of the health outcomes associated with phthalates:
We agree: it's appalling that the chemical industry has been allowed to expose people to yet another dangerous chemical. But there is good news out there too. The Safe Drinking Water and Toxics Enforcement Act of 1986 (also known as Proposition 65) requires the State of California to keep a list of the chemicals known to cause cancer and reproductive harm. Because phthalates have been proven dangerous, the state has added four phthalates to that list in the last two years. At the Center for Environmental Health, we have been working this year to identify products that contain these phthalates so that we can force companies to remove them from products on shelves nationwide. Our studies have found these chemicals in polymer clays, plastic gloves, and in the headset cables of Apple's popular iPod and iPhone. The makers of the clays and gloves have committed to reformulating their products, and we are urging Apple to follow suit. It is painstaking work to search for individual chemicals in products. But until we force our government to adopt a sensible policy that requires companies to prove their chemicals are safe before they allow them on the market (an effort we are also working on), the Center for Environmental Health will continue to find dangerous products and get them off the market. In the meantime, here are two important ways to avoid exposure to these chemicals
|
|
|
Spotlight on a CEH Board Member: Paul Adelstein
Q. Where did you grow up?
Q. You've known Center for Environmental Health founder Michael Green for a long time. How did you two meet?
Q. Why did you join the Board of the Center for Environmental Health?
Q.
You've introduced many of your friends and family to the Center for
Environmental Health. What reactions have you had from people when you
tell them about our work?
Q. What role do you see for the entertainment industry in the promotion of environmental health? |
|
|
The
best holiday movie you may see this year doesn't have any big Hollywood
names in it. It isn't about a selfish person who learns to be
generous, and it doesn't feature an actor you are surprised to see in a
Santa suit. This year's best holiday movie follows a different formula. It is called The Story of Stuff, and it features Center for Environmental Health ally Annie Leonard. Annie plays herself: a smart, funny, and dedicated activist who understands the world we live in and is able to share that understanding with anyone with twenty minutes to spare. Please watch this important and entertaining film on line. We promise it won't feel like homework. |
|
|
Did you know that your old television may contain several pounds of lead? And that it may also contain cadmium, mercury, and a host of other dangerous chemicals? Or that when incinerated, the plastics it is made of can create dioxin, the most dangerous substance known to science? When you as a lone consumer write a letter to Panasonic demanding they make televisions more responsibly or, better yet, that they take them back and dispose of them safely when customers upgrade, Panasonic won't likely pay much heed. You are one person, and Panasonic can ignore your concerns without suffering any impact on its bottom-line. But what if you were buying 10,000 televisions and you raised these same concerns? Then you'd find, as we do, Panasonic suddenly competing with RCA, Sony, and all the other television manufacturers to meet your demands. This is the logic behind our smart, targeted work in the Electronics TakeBack Campaign (formerly Computer TakeBack Campaign). We are working to teach the officials who buy vast numbers of electronics for hospitals and other institutions how to make demands that will invert the industrial world's traditional race to the bottom. To learn about a campaign in which your voice can make a difference, click here. |
|
|
Center for Environmental Health in the News
Whether the story was lead in children's products, the CPSC's attempt to rig tests in favor of industry, or Congress's effort to protect children from dangerous toys, the media made us the nation's go-to organization for eliminating dangerous chemicals from everyday products this year. It brought our work unprecedented attention. Here are just a few of the big stories:
How Gov't Decided Lunch Box Lead Levels
Tempest in a Lunch Box: How the US Government Decided Lead Levels Were OK
Wal-Mart Recalls Baby Bibs For Worries Over Lead Content
Some Baby Bibs Said to Contain Levels of Lead
Admitting Error, Toys ‘R' Us Stops Selling Lead-Tainted Bibs
Get the Lead Out
Toys Need Regulating
Toy Firms Outline Delays in Recalls: Can Take a Month After CPSC is Told About Lead Presence
Congress Weighs Sweeping Overhaul of Consumer Product Commission
Disposal a Murky Issue in Recall of Lead-tainted Items |
|
| Forward this message to a friend | (510) 594.9864 | |